The first of the heavyweights before the Court is Florida Board of Bar Examiners Re: Question as to Whether Undocumented Immigrants are Eligible for Admission to the Florida Bar, to be heard on October 2 at 9:00am. Few case names are as descriptive as this one; the issue before the court will be whether Florida law precludes undocumented immigrants from being members of the bar. The Board of Bar Examiners has completed its character and fitness examination of the applicant, and has stated that it does not see any issues, with the possible exception of immigrant status, that might prevent granting bar membership. The applicant contends, among other things, that there is no rule adopted by the Board that would permit denying the application for bar membership based on undocumented status alone. See “Applying for Membership to the Bar” dated April 14, 2012, below for more discussion.
Immediately following the Board of Bar Examiners’ case, scheduled for the morning of October 2 as well is the case of D.M.T. v.T.M.H., which will decide the contours of parental rights in same-sex relationships involving surrogate parents. This decision may provide insight to the Court’s stance toward same-sex legal issues generally. See the “Scrambled Eggs” below, dated April 11, 2012, for a more comprehensive treatment of the facts and legal issues involved in this case.
Thursday, October 4, sees two more significant cases before the Court, these dealing with separation of powers in state government. Graham, et al. v. Haridopolos, et al. pits the Board of Governors of the state university system against the legislature in a dispute over the meaning of Article IX, Section 7 of the Florida Constitution, and whether that constitutional provision transferred the traditional power of the legislature to make expenditures for state universities to the Board of Governors. If the Board of Governors prevails, its power to control tuition and fees in the state university system will be clarified.
The second case to be heard on Thursday is Southern Alliance for Clean Energy v. Graham, et al. That case is concerned with a direct challenge to the Public Service Commission’s authority to approve cost recovery charges for the benefit of utilities that are developing nuclear facilities, on the basis that there have been no adequate standards imposed on the PSC by the legislature. The potential impact of this decision on the development of nuclear power in this state is clear.
Make sure your fantasy litigation team lineup is updated, this week at the Florida Supreme Court is sure to be action-packed. The full calendar for the week is available here. You can watch the oral arguments streaming live here .